Hmmm... Presented with a subject "you people" would be referring to the subject presented would it not?
"what's the deal with you people" <--- provided with no subject it becomes a general statement that isn't directed to anyone. However, it was not written this way. Atheist was presented before "you people", since you is singular and people is plural "you people" presented with a subject would be directed to those individuals pertaining to that subject.
Atheist whats the deal with you people? and Atheist whats the deal with atheist? Produces the same implications.
Lawl at Protip#2, killing is but an act of constituting murder. However, you are saying to deprive life in any matter would only mean killing and not murdering? Is that your point of exceptions? Because you can kill an odor but you cannot murder it, well yes that's true, and so you use this type of logic to counter the bible but not understand it?
"what's the deal with you people" <--- provided with no subject it becomes a general statement that isn't directed to anyone. However, it was not written this way. Atheist was presented before "you people", since you is singular and people is plural "you people" presented with a subject would be directed to those individuals pertaining to that subject.
Atheist whats the deal with you people? and Atheist whats the deal with atheist? Produces the same implications.
Lawl at Protip#2, killing is but an act of constituting murder. However, you are saying to deprive life in any matter would only mean killing and not murdering? Is that your point of exceptions? Because you can kill an odor but you cannot murder it, well yes that's true, and so you use this type of logic to counter the bible but not understand it?